| |
Mike Levens, associate
professor of Modern American Literature
Lawrence Plotworthy steps onto a makeshift stage behind a
slightly leaning metal microphone stand in the utility room
of the newly constructed Main City Library in Soytown, Two
States Away. He has in his grip a half dozen chapbooks and
a recently published novel flagged with colored tabs marking
the poems and passages he intends to present to a handful
of people seated sedately in front of him on shiny metal gray
folding chairs. A large listless fellow in the front row yawns.
Three others follow suit. Plotworthy lowers his parcel of
books onto a table flanking the lectern, takes a sip of water
poured from a sweaty “Reading Is Fun” pitcher,
and says “hello” over his glasses as he thumbs
through Chapbook Number One. A fan’s husband’s
head bobs, and the drone begins. … An hour later the
drone ends. And in between there were a half dozen chuckles,
a few ahs, and the predictable patter of polite applause.
“It was like staring for an hour at an oil painting
hung in a marble museum. Last one out hit the lights and close
the door.”
If you haven’t been to Lawrence Plotworthy’s reading
or one like it, you haven’t been around the author’s
presentation circuit very long. It has many variations that
slide up and down the interest scale from “It was very
worthwhile.” to “I guess it was okay. I guess
I’m glad I went.” to “Excruciating! Torture!
Don’t ever force me to go to something like that again.”
All these readings, whether redeemed by the author’s
wit or sexy mystique, have one thing in uncommon, they’re
amateur. The presenters have given little or no thought to
how they will voice the words they labored over with so much
“page” care.
In today’s writing market it is not enough to assembled
words, ideas, phrases, and verse into artful packages of printed
precision and insight. If your goal is to attract an audience
larger than Mr. Plotworthy’s in pursuit of coveted commercial
success, writers today have to publicly communicate their
words -- out loud -- with the same skill and precision present
in their texts.
Books, articles, essays, and poems are not marketed in the
privacy of an author’s den, they battle for attention
on the public front at book fairs, university symposiums,
conferences, festivals, libraries, on the TV, over the radio
waves, and wherever else publishers and book distributors
set up shop to sell. But how many exquisite writers ignore,
or even scorn, the idea of presenting their art with the passion
and expertise they employed when writing them?
Legends of them. Sometimes due to snobbery. Sometimes because
of fear. But mostly out of ignorance. And who suffers from
it. They do. Writers with a fraction of their talent and skill
corner markets and garner audiences that could be theirs if
they paid attention to the spoken art.
Yes, communicating verbally to an audience is an art, as much
an art as crafting words on a page, and if you’re contracted
(or pressed into service) by a publisher to read your work
in front of an audience you owe that audience an effective
performance. That’s right, a performance. Whether you’re
reading a text word for word with the paper pressed against
your nose or rifling through it from memory as you dance across
the stage, it’s a performance, and it’s also entertainment.
“Entertainment!” shrieks the protector of all
that’s holy in Halls of Literature. “Great writing
and great writers are above entertainment. The scribbled arts
are sacred, divine, timeless, and life changing, not mere
entertainment.” Right, yes, exactly … about sacred,
divine, and timeless. But all great art from Homer to Dante
to Vonnegut is entertaining. It has to be. Before literature
can elevate, it must first engage and entertain its audience,
hold its attention. It must skillfully use the proven techniques
and devices gleaned from the past and discovered in the present
to cut through the distractions of our media-saturated lives,
to crack the shell of the staid and let loose the unexpected
hurricanes of raw imagination and fresh perspective.
Think about it. Do writing techniques cheapen high literature?
For instance, the flashback. Does the novelist by inserting
flashbacks into her narrative diminish the depth of her story?
Does the reframing of the time sequence lower the common denominator
of her readership? No, she enhances it by providing variety
in the storytelling that makes the information from the past
more immediate, more entertaining. The same can be said for
almost all the devices of poetry, prose, drama, and speech.
Technique is utilized to hold the reader’s attention,
to entertain.
So why then do so many writers insist upon standing ponderously
behind the podiums and lecterns droning their wonderful words
in an unrehearsed monotone of dry coughs and gulps of water?
In some cases, because of pomposity; but in general, it’s
because their high art peers expect them to be above “the
mere actor of words” or “the politician of beliefs”
or “the stand up comedian of light verse.” Or
perhaps the elocutionists of the 19th century gave skilled
and passionate public readings a bad name. Perhaps the rise
of electronic entertainment diminished the public’s
desire to support the oral tradition. Whatever caused this
retreat into the mumbles and smugness of the dry droning exercise
called author presentation, the time for the retreat is over.
The lies of the politicians and the marketers are overshadowing
the truths of our best writers. And because the art of writing
(indeed all the arts) is sacred, writers must learn to communicate
their art effectively with voice and passion on stages, in
bookstores, on campuses, or wherever they gain a toehold and
inspire a listening public, too easily hoodwinked by the audio
and visual assaults of commercial media, to open books and
enliven their minds with the richness of the written word.
By merging the art of performance with the art writing authors
can add powerful tools to their communication enhancing the
success of their own work and more importantly elevating the
public’s awareness and its desire for words that outlive
the latest media fashion and marketing blitz.
|
|
My my my. Such heroic overtones, Mr. Levens. Your article about
learning to climb out from behind the podium makes me want shout
Halleuiah! Only that’s what everybody’s doing. The
politicians, the preachers, the slam poets (for sure), every
person out there with an idea to sell. And that’s the
problem as I see it. You’re asking writers to become proper
and proficient salesmen. Is that why Homer, Dante, and Vonnegut,
to use your examples, wrote?
I suggest to you, Mr. Levens, that allowing readers to make
up their own minds about a piece of literature by actively listening
to the words regardless of how effectively the author sells
those words on stage is a far more credible approach toward
exposing the frauds amongst our society. Let the books speak
for themselves.
How? By encouraging people to read and read more with a deeper
understanding and higher skill. Your approach, I believe, is
pandering to a public that is by increasing numbers choosing
not to read. Television, movies, and computer screens (and the
lower grade writing that supports them) have become the vehicles
for selling the fast and facile in an already over-hurried age,
and rather than finding a way to turn the tide on that, you’re
asking the great writers of our time to join them! I say,
“Stop! Please stop.” Stop selling. Stop talking
(and writing articles) with such know-it-all conviction. Our
times have indeed coming turning: “The [hacks have]
all conviction, [and] the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.”Pleading for reading,
Margaret Amonason
Angor, Iowa
PS And why no photo? |